A vendor's ROI is built on the vendor's assumptions. We test each one against your operation.
Hardware, software, integration, facility modifications and infrastructure.
Labor, maintenance, software subscriptions, support and expected utilization.
Actual throughput requirements, peak capacity, productivity and downtime assumptions.
Payback, five-year total cost, sensitivity analysis and alternative scenarios.
We start with an initial screening of your proposal and goals. If a full financial evaluation is warranted, scope and fees are agreed with you before work begins.
Want to test numbers first? Use the AMR Calculator or review the labor gap, turnover & training costs a calculator can understate.
Illustrative sample — not client work
The hypothetical issues below demonstrate a review format—not findings about a real customer, supplier or proposal.
| Illustrative issue | Decision risk | Evidence and next action |
|---|---|---|
| Peak throughput has not been demonstrated | High: proposed capacity may not support the busiest shift | Operations lead: validate representative peak-order data and agree a witnessed acceptance test before approval |
| Integration responsibilities are unclear | High: unplanned scope or delays could affect go-live | IT lead and supplier: confirm interfaces, ownership, costs and testing responsibilities |
| Recurring costs are excluded from payback | Medium: the business case may overstate returns | Finance lead: include support, subscriptions, maintenance and replacement assumptions in a five-year comparison |
| Labor savings assume immediate full adoption | Medium: ramp-up could delay expected savings | Operations lead: model training, transition staffing and a slower-ramp sensitivity scenario |
An agreed review can document the issue, supporting source, risk priority, responsible owner, recommended action and closure status. Actual priorities depend on your operation and evidence.
Share where you are and what you have received. We will start with an initial screening.